Claude Fable 5
Language AvailableCompare models
ComparingClaude Fable 5with
Pick a model above to see the comparison.
anthropic/claude-fable-5 · by Anthropic · decoder-only-transformer
Pricing — 1 offering(s)
Input tokens
- $10.00 / 1M tokens (input) Current 2026-06-09 → present
Output tokens
- $50.00 / 1M tokens (output) Current 2026-06-09 → present
Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.
Capability profile
reasoning strong
coding strong
tool use strong
instruction following strong
context window strong
multilingual strong
speed weak
cost efficiency weak
Coding benchmarks
View full leaderboard →| Benchmark | Score | Harness | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| swe-bench-verified ↗ | 95.0% 2026-06 | — | 📊 leaderboard ↗ |
Operator guidance
Route here when Opus 4.8 is not sufficient — the new ceiling for publicly available Claude capability. Adaptive thinking is always on, so there is no effort parameter to tune. Drop to Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) for most agentic workloads where cost matters; Sonnet 5 ($2–3/$10–15) for standard production use.
Use cases
- The most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic coding tasks
- Complex multi-step agent workflows where quality dominates cost and latency
- Top-end benchmark and evaluation work
Limitations
- Highest cost and latency of any publicly available Claude model ($10/$50 per MTok)
- Updated tokenizer produces ~30% more tokens than Sonnet 4.6 and earlier — factor into cost comparisons
- Vendor-reported benchmark scores exist (SWE-bench Pro 69.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1 82.7%, OSWorld-Verified 83.4%, HLE-with-tools 57.9% — source: Anthropic Sonnet 5 launch comparison graphic, 2026-07) but are not yet seeded to modelglass-coding, pending SCO-142 benchmark feasibility investigation
- Adaptive thinking always on — cannot be disabled; may increase output length and cost vs. non-thinking models