Claude Haiku 4.5
Language Available Full comparison ↗ anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 · by Anthropic
· decoder-only-transformer
Pricing — 1 offering(s)
Input tokens
- $1.00 / 1M tokens (input)
Current
2026-06-12 → present
SCO-606 re-verification: price unchanged at $1/MTok. SCO-613 (2026-09-20): renamed slug/model.id/filename…
SCO-606 re-verification: price unchanged at $1/MTok. SCO-613 (2026-09-20): renamed slug/model.id/filename from claude-haiku-4(-anthropic) to claude-haiku-4-5(-anthropic) — "Claude Haiku 4" (without ".5") never existed; Anthropic skipped the 4.0 point release for Haiku entirely (3.5 -> 4.5 directly). This entry's price was always correct (it was always tracking Haiku 4.5's real $1/$5 rate); only the name/slug/id were wrong. Companion renames in the same pass: modelglass-coding's registry/models/claude-haiku-4.yaml -> claude-haiku-4-5.yaml and this repo's own ontology/models/claude-haiku-4.yaml -> claude-haiku-4-5.yaml, plus closest_competitors citations updated in gpt-5-4-mini-openai.yaml, gpt-5-6-luna-openai.yaml, and claude-3-5-haiku-anthropic.yaml.
Output tokens
- $5.00 / 1M tokens (output)
Current
2026-06-12 → present
SCO-606 re-verification: unchanged at $5/MTok. See the input tier's note for the SCO-613 rename history.
Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.
See how Claude Haiku 4.5 fits into a cost-aware routing setup
See how →Capability profile
How Claude Haiku 4.5 rates across core capability dimensions, with the task-level evidence behind each rating.
SWE-bench Verified (500 human-verified GitHub issues; patch must pass the repo's own tests; no file-location hints): resolves 73.3% — fails roughly 1 issue in 4. Vendor-reported (Anthropic, Claude Haiku 4.5 launch; agentless-style two-tool scaffold). Full harness/version detail: companion modelglass-coding entry.
200K-token context.
Smallest/fastest Claude 4 tier — low latency and cost.
Ratings are estimated — limited independent data is available for this model.
Coding benchmarks
View the full coding benchmark leaderboard →| Benchmark | Score | Harness | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| swe-bench-verified ↗ | 73.3% 2025-10 | agentless 2.0 | 🏢 vendor ↗ |
| terminal-bench-2-1 | 44.2% 2026-08 | terminus-2 | 🔬 independent ↗ |
Operator guidance
Route here for throughput and cost. Step up to Sonnet 4 when a task needs more reasoning or coding depth than Haiku reliably provides.
Use cases
- High-volume, latency- and cost-sensitive workloads
- Cheap tool-calling, classification, and short-form generation
Limitations
- Lower reasoning/coding ceiling than Sonnet/Opus 4
- Capability ratings are qualitative, not a single cited benchmark run