FLUX.1 [schnell]
Image AvailableCompare models
ComparingFLUX.1 [schnell]with
Pick a model above to see the comparison.
bfl/flux-1-schnell · by Black Forest Labs · Flow matching / rectified flow
Pricing — 2 offering(s)
Default
- $0.0030 / megapixel Current 2026-06-10 → present
Default
- $0.0030 / image Current 2026-06-09 → present
Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.
Capability profile
Inference speed strong
Photorealism moderate
Prompt adherence moderate
Compositional accuracy moderate
Text rendering moderate
Artistic style range moderate
Resolution ceiling moderate
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Score | Config | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenEval | ≈0.66 | Schnell-specific GenEval is not published; this is the FLUX.1 [dev] figure it is distilled from (third-party comparisons report ~0.66-0.71 depending on sampling). Schnell should be expected to score at or slightly below dev. | independent ↗ |
Operator guidance
Route here when speed and cost per image dominate and top-tier fidelity isn't required. Step up to FLUX.1 [dev]/[pro] for higher fidelity, or to DALL·E 3 for the strongest prompt following and in-image text.
Use cases
- Rapid iteration and concepting where throughput beats peak fidelity
- High-volume, low-cost generation (thumbnails, option sets, feeds)
- Interactive / near-real-time UX
Provenance notice
- Open weights with no built-in content-provenance metadata (no C2PA/watermark by default)
- Base training-data composition not publicly disclosed by Black Forest Labs
Limitations
- Distillation trades away some fine detail and diversity versus FLUX.1 [dev]
- No separately published GenEval / T2I-CompBench / FID for schnell specifically
- Weaker than DALL·E 3 on complex compositions and legible text