← All models

FLUX.1 Kontext

Image Available Full comparison ↗

bfl/flux-kontext · by Black Forest Labs · Flow matching / rectified flow

Pricing — 1 offering(s)

[pro]

  • $0.04 / image Current 2026-07-23 → present
    effective_from is the date this entry was sourced, not a confirmed price-change date. Cross-checked against…

    effective_from is the date this entry was sourced, not a confirmed price-change date. Cross-checked against fal.ai's hosting of the same model (fal-ai/flux-pro/kontext, also $0.04/image) — not recorded as a separate file since BFL's own API is the primary, most-authoritative host and Krea's listing (the source that surfaced this gap) treats "Flux Kontext" as one line item.

[max]

  • $0.08 / image Current 2026-07-23 → present

    effective_from is the date this entry was sourced, not a confirmed price-change date.

Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.

See how FLUX.1 Kontext fits into a cost-aware routing setup

See how →

Capability profile

How FLUX.1 Kontext rates across core capability dimensions, with the task-level evidence behind each rating.

Prompt adherence Strong

BFL's own materials headline 'great prompt following' for [pro] and describe [max] as adding stronger instruction adherence and typography accuracy for edit instructions specifically, not just generation prompts.

Text rendering Strong

BFL's own materials describe [max] as having 'industry-leading typography' — a comparative vendor claim, not independently benchmarked here.

Compositional accuracy Strong

Core product claim: character consistency and style-preserving edits across iterations when editing an existing image, per BFL's own model page.

Inference speed Strong

[pro] is positioned by BFL as optimized for 'fast, iterative image editing'; [max] trades some speed for quality ('Maximum Performance at High Speed' per BFL's own framing).

Photorealism Unknown

No specific claim found beyond generic quality marketing.

Artistic style range Unknown
Resolution ceiling Unknown

BFL's own docs don't state an output resolution ceiling for Kontext specifically (contrast with FLUX.2's stated up-to-4MP output).

Ratings are estimated — limited independent data is available for this model.

Operator guidance

Route here for image-editing workloads (an existing image plus a text instruction) rather than pure text-to-image generation; for that, use FLUX 1.1 [pro] or FLUX.1 [dev]/[schnell]. Within Kontext, [pro] is the faster, cheaper default and [max] the higher-fidelity, pricier tier. Black Forest Labs now recommends FLUX.2 over Kontext for new projects (better quality, multi-reference support, up to 4MP output), so treat Kontext as the legacy editing option.

Use cases

Limitations

Citations