Seedream 4.5
Image Available Full comparison ↗ bytedance/seedream-4-5 · by ByteDance Seed
· Diffusion transformer (DiT)
Pricing — 1 offering(s)
Default
- $0.040 / image Current 2026-07-22 → present
Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.
See how Seedream 4.5 fits into a cost-aware routing setup
See how →Capability profile
Text rendering strong
Compositional accuracy strong
Prompt adherence strong
Resolution ceiling unknown
Inference speed unknown
Photorealism unknown
Artistic style range unknown
Operator guidance
Route here in preference to Seedream 4.0 for the same use cases — 4.5 is the current-generation model in this family (4.0 is now `generation: previous`). Compare against Gemini 3.1 Flash Image or Gemini 3 Pro Image (also strong on text rendering) — no independently verified head-to-head exists between any of these in this registry.
Use cases
- In-image text, formula, and dense-text rendering, improved over 4.0
- Multi-reference-image editing where consistency of reference-image details matters
- Direct successor to 4.0 for the same unified generation+editing workflow
Limitations
- Resolution ceiling, inference speed, photorealism, and artistic range are unrated — no vendor-primary claim found distinct from generic marketing or unattributed secondary press
- ByteDance's own MagicBench comparison claims are vendor-run, not one of this registry's tracked independent benchmarks (GenEval/T2I-CompBench/etc.), so deliberately not recorded in a structured benchmarks field — same treatment 4.0's entry gives its own MagicBench claims
- No independently published GenEval / T2I-CompBench score found. An independent Elo does now exist: Artificial Analysis Text to Image Arena (artificialanalysis.ai/image/leaderboard/text-to-image, confirmed 2026-08-19, SCO-462 sweep) ranks Seedream 4.5 #31 of ~147 models tracked, Elo 1204 — lower than the predecessor Seedream 4.0's own Elo 1223 on the same arena (see seedream-4-0.yaml), a counterintuitive result worth flagging rather than smoothing over; ByteDance's own MagicBench claims a prompt-adherence improvement over 4.0, but that's a different benchmark and doesn't contradict this arena result. A different benchmark type than GenEval/T2I-CompBench, not a substitute for one
Citations
Compare models
ComparingSeedream 4.5with
Pick a model above to see the comparison.