DeepSeek R1
Language Retired Full comparison ↗ deepseek/deepseek-r1 · by DeepSeek
· decoder-only-transformer
Pricing — 1 offering(s)
About this offering: DeepSeek R1 (API model deepseek-reasoner) at its 2025-01-20 launch pricing. From DeepSeek-V3.1 (2025-08-21), deepseek-reasoner became the thinking mode of a single hybrid model rather than a separate R1. From 2026-04-24 deepseek-reasoner pointed to the thinking mode of DeepSeek V4 Flash, and DeepSeek discontinued the name on 2026-07-24 (DeepSeek API change log). On DeepSeek's API, thinking mode is now offered on deepseek-flash (DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash) and deepseek-v4-pro (pricing page, checked 2026-10-09). The open-weights R1 and R1-0528 remain available from third-party hosts such as Together AI and OpenRouter.
Input tokens
Retired — no longer sold · last price $0.55 / 1M tokens (input), until 2025-11-30
- $0.55 / 1M tokens (input) Historical 2025-01-20 → 2025-11-30
Output tokens
Retired — no longer sold · last price $2.19 / 1M tokens (output), until 2025-11-30
- $2.19 / 1M tokens (output) Historical 2025-01-20 → 2025-11-30
Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.
See how DeepSeek R1 fits into a cost-aware routing setup
See how →About DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 was introduced in early 2025 (arXiv 2501.12948) as DeepSeek's first dedicated extended-reasoning model: a 671B-parameter mixture-of-experts transformer with 37B parameters active per token that generates an internal chain of thought before its final answer, in the style of OpenAI's o1. Those reasoning tokens are billed as output. Its training pipeline was reinforcement-learning-heavy — Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) applied to reward verifiable outcomes in maths, coding and logic — rather than the supervised fine-tuning that dominates most instruction-tuned models.
R1 shipped under an MIT open-weights licence, so it can be self-hosted or reached through third-party hosts such as Together AI and OpenRouter at materially lower cost than DeepSeek's own API. It is a Chinese-lab model, which can carry data-residency or compliance constraints for some deployments. A later checkpoint, R1-0528, improved its vendor-reported SWE-bench Verified score from 49.2% to 57.6%.
The model's lifecycle is unusual and worth understanding before building against it. DeepSeek's own `deepseek-reasoner` API alias stopped pointing at R1 on 2025-08-21, when DeepSeek-V3.1 unified thinking and non-thinking modes behind one toggle; that alias now routes to deepseek-v4-flash's thinking mode and retires entirely on 2026-07-24. R1 has no standalone successor entry in this registry — reasoning capability now lives inside the hybrid V-series models. For a stable long-term target, the open-weights checkpoints (R1 and R1-0528) are the ones to pin.
Modelglass rates this entry's capability confidence as high on the reasoning dimension, but the broader ratings are qualitative rather than a single cited benchmark run, and the reasoning overhead can multiply effective cost three- to five-fold on hard problems — factor both in when comparing R1 against non-reasoning models on price.
Capability profile
How DeepSeek R1 rates across core capability dimensions, with the task-level evidence behind each rating.
Core capability — designed for extended multi-step reasoning. Competitive with o1 on AIME/MATH.
SWE-bench Verified (500 human-verified GitHub issues; the patch must pass the repo's own tests; no file-location hints): resolves 57.6% (R1-0528 checkpoint), so it fails roughly 2 issues in 5. Vendor-reported (DeepSeek's R1-0528 model card, agentless framework). The original R1 scored 49.2%.
Reasoning model not designed for function calling; many providers omit tool support for R1. Aligned with registry capabilities.agentic_tool_use: false.
Follows structured instructions well but can over-reason simple requests.
128K context.
Strong English and Chinese; other languages less well covered.
Slow due to internal reasoning budget; reasoning tokens add significantly to latency and cost.
Coding benchmarks
View the full coding benchmark leaderboard →| Benchmark | Score | Harness | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| swe-bench-verified ↗ | 57.6% 2025-05 | agentless | 🏢 vendor ↗ |
| livecodebench ↗ | 65.9% 2025-01 | — | 📄 paper ↗ |
| aider-polyglot ↗ | 71.4% 2025-05 | aider | 📊 leaderboard ↗ |
| terminal-bench-2-1 | 19.1% 2026-08 | terminus-2 | 🔬 independent ↗ |
| bigcodebench ↗ | 29.7% 2025-01 | — | 📊 leaderboard ↗ |
Operator guidance
Route here when reasoning depth is the primary requirement and o1/o3 cost is prohibitive. Open weights mean it can be self-hosted or accessed via third-party hosts (Together AI, OpenRouter) at significantly lower cost than native DeepSeek API. Avoid for latency-sensitive or simple workloads — the reasoning overhead adds substantial time and token cost.
Use cases
- Complex multi-step reasoning, math, and science problems
- Advanced code generation and algorithm design
- Open-weights reasoning deployment on own infrastructure
Limitations
- The deepseek-reasoner API alias stopped naming this model back on 2025-08-21 (DeepSeek-V3.1's hybrid thinking/non-thinking unification); it now routes to deepseek-v4-flash's thinking mode and retires entirely 2026-07-24 — use open-weights hosts (R1 / R1-0528) for longevity
- Reasoning tokens can 3–5× the effective cost on complex problems
- Chinese lab; data-residency or compliance constraints may apply
- Capability ratings are qualitative, not a single cited benchmark run