← All models

MAI-Transcribe

Audio Preview Full comparison ↗

microsoft-azure/mai-transcribe · by Microsoft AI · llm-based-asr

Pricing — 1 offering(s)

LLM Speech transcription

  • $0.0060 / minute Current 2026-04-02 → present

Showing the active price and any recorded history. Full pricing history is available via the paid API — see API docs.

See how MAI-Transcribe fits into a cost-aware routing setup

See how →

Capability profile

transcription accuracy strong
language support moderate
speaker diarisation weak
real time streaming weak
custom vocabulary moderate

Benchmarks

Benchmark Score Config Source
WER (FLEURS, 25 languages — MAI-Transcribe-1, Microsoft-reported) 3.86 % Mean WER across MAI-Transcribe-1's 25 supported languages. Microsoft reports it as the lowest average against Scribe v2, Whisper-large-v3, GPT-Transcribe and Gemini 3.1 Flash on the same 25-language set. source ↗
WER (Artificial Analysis Speech-to-Text leaderboard — independent) MAI-Transcribe-1.5 listed at 2.4% WER, MAI-Transcribe-1 at 2.6%, under Microsoft/Azure. AA's own evaluation set, not FLEURS — directionally consistent with Microsoft's best-in-class claim. source ↗

Operator guidance

Reach for MAI-Transcribe when you want strong published multilingual accuracy at a low price ($0.36/hour, ~2.8x cheaper than Azure Cognitive Services Speech-to-Text at $1.00/hour) and your workload is file-based. It is in public preview with no SLA, so it is not a fit for production workloads that need contractual guarantees — use microsoft-azure/speech-stt or Deepgram Nova-3 there. It also has no speaker diarization and no real-time streaming; route to speech-stt, Nova-3, or Amazon Transcribe for those. Its closest accuracy peers are OpenAI GPT-Transcribe and ElevenLabs Scribe v2. Only MAI-Transcribe-1.5 should be used — MAI-Transcribe-1 was deprecated on 20 Aug 2026.

Use cases

Limitations

Citations